Where Do Publishers Expect Us to Find the Funds?

February 25, 2011 at 11:47 pm (HCOD, Uncategorized) (, , , , , , )

I just received a letter from Overdrive explaining all the efforts they have made to offer us, public libraries, a better service. This is a true statement.  They developed an app for Apple and Android users.  They added over 180,000 new titles.  They are also planning many upgrades and enhancements in the coming year.  However, in the same letter it was also mentioned that there are going to be some major changes to their borrowing platform based on the concerns and limitations being set by publishers.  Basically, within the one user-one, one-title platform, there will be a cap on the amount of times an eBook can circulate before libraries are forced to buy another copy.  This begs the question:  How many times will an eBook be borrowed before a library is forced to purchase another copy?  10 times?  50 times?  100 times?  I understand part of the logistics behind the cap.  EBooks never have to be replaced.  Patrons will never lose them or forget to bring them back. They require no maintenance like a regular, tangible books would eventually require.  Currently, once an eBook is purchased it will always be part of the library’s catalog.

The whole issue has my wheels turning and I am really fired up about this.  On the blog, Read, Write, Web: This Library E-Book Will Self-Destruct After 26 Checkouts, the recent post states the HarperCollins is planning the cap being a 26 rotation!!! What!! We have books that go out for far longer, sometimes 80 times, before they need maintenance or a replacement copy. This is an unfair and unjust model! In fact, it proposes that it is more reasonable for a public library to purchase a hardcover book, because libraries would get more circulation out of their purchases without the caps on how many times they are allowed to let a book go out.

In a time where most libraries are faced with both layoffs and budget cuts, how do publishers feel this is a sustainable purchasing model?  They want us to buy the content, but restrict access to it. Basically, publishers do not want to support public libraries circulating their e-content.  They may say that they do, but as in so may other instances in life, actions speak louder than words.  Do not misunderstand me.  I do not blame Overdrive at all.  In fact, they are more of the go-between that is forced to deliver libraries the bad news.  This is strictly an issue with publishing houses and how they want us to repeatedly repurchase the same title over and over. So I am left asking: Where do publishers expect us to find the funds to fuel and ridiculous and unsustainable purchasing model?  If you know the answer, please clue me in.

Melissa Brisbin

Advertisements

Permalink 3 Comments